Home › ELEKTOR FORUMS › Software Defined Radio (May 2007) › What about the Tayloe detector?

ELEKTOR FORUMS

Please log in to post a reply or subscribe / unsubscribe to topics

Topic: What about the Tayloe detector?

Author Post

MichaelKornby

2 posts

Popping In
Popping In

Read post 13-08-2007 04:21

This project seems very interesting and I am certainly going to build it and play with it as soon as I have time. But I am am also very interested in the so-called Tayloe detctor, that Gerald Youngblood presented in his QEX articles in 2002/2003 (Software defined radio for the masses). This detector is similar to a commutating filter and would use a 1-to-4 switch (eg FST3253) instead of the 74HC4066 switches. The rest of the circuitry would be similar to your SDR. The benefit of the Tayloe detector seems to be that it gives a better conversion gain(?).
Have you considered this detector when designing the SDR? What were your reasons for choosing the current Weaver method instead of the Tayloe? Are there obvious drawbacks to this detector?

Thanks

Elektor Editor

501 posts

Power User
Power User

Read post 28-08-2007 10:48

The Flex Radio Articles in QEX gave rise to Gerald Youngblood's SDR1000 Transceiver which uses the Tayloe detector. The 4 articles which make up the QEX series on the SDR1000 don't seem to be available to download from Flex-Radio.com anymore. The Tayloe detector looks like a rediscovery of the Commutating Detector.

Jan

MichaelKornby

2 posts

Popping In
Popping In

Read post 04-09-2007 13:12

I think that the articles are still available here:
http://kb.flex-radio.com/article.aspx?id=10152&cNode=1S5G6I

Michael

Please log in to post a reply or subscribe / unsubscribe to topics

Bestseller

PIC Microcontrollers

This hands-on book covers a series of exciting and fun projects with PIC microcontrollers. You can build more than 50 projects for your own use.